![]() | This article's lead section may be too long. (June 2024) |
![]() G-AWND, the aircraft involved in the incident, seen in 1985 | |
Occurrence | |
---|---|
Date | 2 August 1990 |
Summary | Passengers and crew taken hostage hours after the Invasion of Kuwait |
Site | Kuwait International Airport, Kuwait City, Kuwait |
Aircraft | |
Aircraft type | Boeing 747-136 |
Aircraft name | Coniston Water |
Operator | British Airways |
Registration | G-AWND |
Flight origin | London Heathrow Airport |
1st stopover | Kuwait International Airport, Kuwait City |
Last stopover | Madras International Airport, Madras |
Destination | Subang International Airport, Kuala Lumpur |
Occupants | 385 |
Passengers | 367 |
Crew | 18 |
Fatalities | 1 |
Survivors | 384 |
British Airways Flight 149 was a flight from London Heathrow Airport to Subang International Airport (now Sultan Abdul Aziz Shah Airport), then the international airport for Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, via Kuwait and Madras International Airports, operated by British Airways using a Boeing 747-136, with registration G-AWND, on 2 August 1990.
Following the airliner's arrival at Kuwait International Airport, outside of Kuwait City, the flight was never resumed as a consequence of ongoing events on the ground. Prior to landing at Kuwait International, the neighbouring nation of Iraq had launched a full-scale invasion of Kuwait during the early hours of that morning. Within hours, elements of the Iraqi Army had rapidly advanced as far as Kuwait City and had taken control of the airport. Accordingly, the aircraft used to operate the flight, its passengers and its crew were all captured by the occupying Iraqi forces on the ground. Following their capture, the majority of the passengers and crew were initially detained at several nearby hotels along with other foreigners under armed guard. The airliner was later destroyed on the ground; the identity of those responsible for its destruction remains unknown.[citation needed]
During their detention, multiple passengers have alleged that they witnessed a number of atrocities performed by Iraqi forces and were subjected to abuse themselves. While women and children were offered the opportunity to return home during late August, the remaining detainees were dispersed to various sites in Iraq and Kuwait and were used by the Iraqis as human shields to deter offensive operations by opposing Coalition forces during the Gulf War. During one infamous incident, an Iraqi television broadcast showed Iraqi President Saddam Hussein alongside a number of the detainees as a part of wartime propaganda efforts. To secure their release, former British prime minister Edward Heath personally travelled to Baghdad to lead negotiations, which included direct talks between Heath and Saddam Hussein. One passenger from the manifest (a Kuwaiti citizen who had concluded his flight and disembarked the aircraft prior to BA 149's capture) was listed as having been killed by Iraqi troops while all remaining passengers were later released from their captivity following the conclusion of the conflict.[1][2][3] Many of the surviving detainees developed post-traumatic stress disorder after being released from captivity.[4]
BA 149 continues to be the subject of controversy and debate over whether the situation could have been averted, as well as accusations and conspiracy theories that the flight was used as a Trojan horse to transport undercover British military and intelligence personnel into Kuwait.[5] Several investigations have since been conducted into the incident, leading to official denials from Margaret Thatcher, Britain's Prime Minister at the time, of any government efforts to influence British Airways' actions in regard to Flight 149. On 23 November 2021, Foreign Secretary Liz Truss confirmed that the government of that time had misled British Airways and the public about a prior warning that was not passed on to the airline.[6]
On 1 July 2024 it was announced that passengers and crew from the flight were to sue the government and British Airways on the grounds that warnings that had been received were not acted upon.[7]
norm bak
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).BA14919920830
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).